Re: Blocked Ports
- From: Ed Greshko <Ed.Greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 11:57:30 +0800
On 03/31/2012 11:23 AM, Mike Dwiggins wrote:
On 03/30/2012 07:25 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/30/2012 03:58 PM, Mike Dwiggins wrote:Yes, NAT works quite well.
I will check when I get home in the morning. I hide the IP due to a STUPID companyOne other thing....
security policy!
I think I can assume that your eth0 interface is your Internet facing interface and
that it has an assigned IP address from your ISP. Also, your eth1 interface is a
"private" IP address range and not route-able on the Internet. So, you also need to
have NAT configured to make things work for hosts on the eth1 LAN to route their
traffic through this box.
You do have that NAT up, yes?
OK, then it looks to me that the only thing missing is a properly defined "default
route".
--
Do not condemn the judgment of another because it differs from your own. You may both
be wrong. -- Dandemis
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
- References:
- Blocked Ports
- From: Mike Dwiggins
- Re: Blocked Ports
- From: Ed Greshko
- Re: Blocked Ports
- From: Mike Dwiggins
- Re: Blocked Ports
- From: Ed Greshko
- Re: Blocked Ports
- From: Mike Dwiggins
- Re: Blocked Ports
- From: Ed Greshko
- Re: Blocked Ports
- From: Mike Dwiggins
- Re: Blocked Ports
- From: Ed Greshko
- Re: Blocked Ports
- From: Mike Dwiggins
- Re: Blocked Ports
- From: Ed Greshko
- Re: Blocked Ports
- From: Mike Dwiggins
- Re: Blocked Ports
- From: Ed Greshko
- Re: Blocked Ports
- From: Mike Dwiggins
- Blocked Ports
- Prev by Date: Re: in case you did not know about kerTeX distribution
- Next by Date: Re: in case you did not know about kerTeX distribution
- Previous by thread: Re: Blocked Ports
- Next by thread: Re: Blocked Ports
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|