Re: [kde-linux] KDE 3 Beta

On Friday 26 October 2007 01:23:02 pm James Richard Tyrer wrote:
H.P. Garcia wrote:
I want to know if anyone got KDE4 up and going?

That depends on how you define your terms. :-)

I managed to compile it, install it and start the desktop. However,
since there was no menu and no way to configure the panel, it was not
very useful. I managed to load KPat and play solitaire despite the fact
that the background can't be set and the card deck chooser seems to be
different and partially broken.

As others have said, this is not yet a Beta release.

This IS a _BETA_ release. Are you not sure the true meaning of a Beta release?
On another note does anyone know if RC was tagged for release on the 30th?

I sure hope so.. I can't wait to give it a shot.. Hopefully it won't be as
frightening as halloween the day after (har har har..).

Sorry I didnt' give a good write up on KDE 4 Beta 3.. There isn't much to it,
and until there is more stability I don't see the need to talk about it.

Ben


___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde-linux mailing list.
Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-linux.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Net 2.0 and Visual Studio 2003
    ... As long as you are coding 1.1, you can compile 2.0. ... Better to install the Express (or beta 1 of the full product, ... > I just downloaded dthe new Net framework 2, beta 1 and I wonder if and ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework)
  • Re: Nasm 0.99.00
    ... I had to install 2.04 beta to get 0.98.39 to compile, ... Yeah, 2.04 beta has them, but 2.03 doesn't. ... pointer will break strict aliasing rules." ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: Nasm 0.99.00
    ... I had to install 2.04 beta to get 0.98.39 to compile, ... Yeah, 2.04 beta has them, but 2.03 doesn't. ... pointer will break strict aliasing rules." ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: [SLE] mtink / Epson C84
    ... > The beta appears solid, but you must compile and install, no rpm and ...
    (SuSE)
  • Re: VS.NET 2005 and 2003
    ... It is a beta. ... I would NEVER install a beta on a machine that has your work without setting ... "Phil Wright" wrote in message ... > VS.NET 2003 do not compile. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.windowsforms)