Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3)
From: Tupshin Harper (tupshin_at_tupshin.com)
Date: 07/24/03
- Previous message: Andre Tomt: "Re: Feature proposal (scheduling related)"
- In reply to: Hans Reiser: "Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3)"
- Next in thread: Shawn: "Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3)"
- Reply: Shawn: "Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 21:26:45 -0700 To: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Hans Reiser wrote:
> Please look at http://www.namesys.com/benchmarks/v4marks.html
>
> In brief, V4 is way faster than V3, and the wandering logs are indeed
> twice as fast as fixed location logs when performing writes in large
> batches.
>
<snip>
I am interested in testing this out, but the latest patch on the namesys
sight appears to be against 2.5.60 which was never usable on my
hardware. If there is a later patch, or if somebody has adapted it to
work against 2.6.0-test1(or anything comparably recent), please let me know.
-Tupshin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Andre Tomt: "Re: Feature proposal (scheduling related)"
- In reply to: Hans Reiser: "Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3)"
- Next in thread: Shawn: "Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3)"
- Reply: Shawn: "Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
