Re: Switching to the OSL License, in a dual way.
Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu
Date: 07/25/03
- Previous message: Andries Brouwer: "Re: Partition check issue (againandagain??)"
- In reply to: John Bradford: "Re: Switching to the OSL License, in a dual way."
- Next in thread: Hank Leininger: "Re: Switching to the OSL License, in a dual way."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: John Bradford <john@grabjohn.com> Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 11:36:30 -0400
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 16:33:24 BST, John Bradford said:
> What if a patent is discovered which is owned by somebody other than
> Larry, which covers something in BK? If nobody is allowed to use BK,
> how would we get the data out?
And more importantly, what would you put the data back *INTO*?
There's no guarantee that said patent doesn't also screw over all CVS users,
or SCCS, or what have you.
Also, there's a *very* good chance that any patent that hits BK would *also*
afflict a BK clone, unless they were lucky enough to use a totally different
algorithm to achieve the same on-the-wire result. And if the patent is against
the *idea* of doing XYZ with a computer, then the algorithm won't matter anyhow.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Andries Brouwer: "Re: Partition check issue (againandagain??)"
- In reply to: John Bradford: "Re: Switching to the OSL License, in a dual way."
- Next in thread: Hank Leininger: "Re: Switching to the OSL License, in a dual way."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|