Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3)
From: Yury Umanets (umka_at_namesys.com)
Date: 07/26/03
- Previous message: Apurva Mehta: "Random Oopses on 2.6.0-test1-mm2"
- In reply to: Daniel Egger: "Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3)"
- Next in thread: Daniel Egger: "Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3)"
- Reply: Daniel Egger: "Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3)"
- Reply: Jussi Laako: "Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Daniel Egger <degger@fhm.edu> Date: 26 Jul 2003 11:19:50 +0400
On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 05:08, Daniel Egger wrote:
> Am Fre, 2003-07-25 um 16.39 schrieb Yury Umanets:
>
> > Reiser4 has plugin-based architecture. So, anybody is able to write new
> > block allocator plugin.
>
> Cool.
>
> > Speaking about possible embedded usage... What kind of embedded devices
> > do you mean. Reiser4 driver is big enough in size for some of them (for
> > instance, for mine MPIO MP3 player :))
>
> I'm talking about pretty standard ix86 hardware which has embedded like
> properties such as fanless and motorless use, hardware watchdog, flash
> memory but only few of the typical limitations like restricted memory
> (we are using 256 or 512 MB), slow CPU, few connectors.
>
> So basically we do have pretty powerful hardware with huge storage and
> memory and now need a FS which is fast and reliable even on flash
> memory. JFFS2 is nice but way too slow once one has bigger sizes.
I think this is more then enough for running reiser4. Reiser4 is a linux
filesystem first of all, and linux is able to be ran on even worse
hardware then you have.
-- We're flying high, we're watching the world passes by... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Apurva Mehta: "Random Oopses on 2.6.0-test1-mm2"
- In reply to: Daniel Egger: "Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3)"
- Next in thread: Daniel Egger: "Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3)"
- Reply: Daniel Egger: "Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3)"
- Reply: Jussi Laako: "Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|