Re: time for some drivers to be removed?
From: Alan Cox (alan_at_lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: 07/27/03
- Previous message: Adrian Bunk: "Re: time for some drivers to be removed?"
- In reply to: Adrian Bunk: "Re: time for some drivers to be removed?"
- Next in thread: Herbert Pötzl: "Re: time for some drivers to be removed?"
- Reply: Herbert Pötzl: "Re: time for some drivers to be removed?"
- Reply: Adrian Bunk: "Re: time for some drivers to be removed?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de> Date: 27 Jul 2003 21:56:11 +0100
On Sul, 2003-07-27 at 21:56, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> That's no problem for me.
>
> The only question is how to call the option that allows building only on
> UP (e.g. cli/sti usage in the driver)? My suggestion was BROKEN_ON_SMP,
> would you suggest OBSOLETE_ON_SMP?
Interesting question - whatever I guess. We don't have an existing convention.
How many drivers have we got nowdays that failing on just SMP ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Adrian Bunk: "Re: time for some drivers to be removed?"
- In reply to: Adrian Bunk: "Re: time for some drivers to be removed?"
- Next in thread: Herbert Pötzl: "Re: time for some drivers to be removed?"
- Reply: Herbert Pötzl: "Re: time for some drivers to be removed?"
- Reply: Adrian Bunk: "Re: time for some drivers to be removed?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|