Re: i8042 problem
From: Alan Cox (alan_at_lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: 07/28/03
- Previous message: Michael Buesch: "Ethernet falls into deep sleep."
- In reply to: Pete Zaitcev: "Re: i8042 problem"
- Next in thread: Andries Brouwer: "Re: i8042 problem"
- Reply: Andries Brouwer: "Re: i8042 problem"
- Reply: Pete Zaitcev: "Re: i8042 problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com> Date: 28 Jul 2003 12:25:05 +0100
On Llu, 2003-07-28 at 02:55, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 12:47:26 +0200
> > From: Andries Brouwer <aebr@win.tue.nl>
>
> > So the culprit is the failing of atkbd_probe().
> > It does a ATKBD_CMD_GETID, but gets no answer, then a
> > ATKBD_CMD_SETLEDS, and that command fails.
>
> I see the light now. Somehow I imagined that atkbd code does not call
> the ->open for the port. Now it all falls into place. Everything works
> with a bigger timeout.
Unfortunately with this change several people still report failures
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Michael Buesch: "Ethernet falls into deep sleep."
- In reply to: Pete Zaitcev: "Re: i8042 problem"
- Next in thread: Andries Brouwer: "Re: i8042 problem"
- Reply: Andries Brouwer: "Re: i8042 problem"
- Reply: Pete Zaitcev: "Re: i8042 problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
