Re: 2.6-test2: gcc-3.3.1 warning.
From: Alan Cox (alan_at_lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: 07/29/03
- Previous message: Neil Brown: "Re: NFS Server running 2.6.0-test2"
- In reply to: Tomas Szepe: "Re: 2.6-test2: gcc-3.3.1 warning."
- Next in thread: Randy.Dunlap: "Re: 2.6-test2: gcc-3.3.1 warning."
- Reply: Randy.Dunlap: "Re: 2.6-test2: gcc-3.3.1 warning."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com> Date: 29 Jul 2003 12:57:52 +0100
On Maw, 2003-07-29 at 11:20, Tomas Szepe wrote:
> > What is the difference between backporting a patch from 3.3.1-pre to 3.3,
> > and using 3.3.1-pre directly ? Ah, that you get less bug corrected.
>
> Large. 3.3 is a development series. It DOES introduce new stuff.
>
> In production environments you definitely want to stick with 3.2.3
> or (better yet) 2.95.3.
3.2 is probably the best, but lots of people are using gcc 3.3 to build
kernels and so far all the things we've hit have been the stricter
parser throwing up on technically invalid C in the kernel source/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Neil Brown: "Re: NFS Server running 2.6.0-test2"
- In reply to: Tomas Szepe: "Re: 2.6-test2: gcc-3.3.1 warning."
- Next in thread: Randy.Dunlap: "Re: 2.6-test2: gcc-3.3.1 warning."
- Reply: Randy.Dunlap: "Re: 2.6-test2: gcc-3.3.1 warning."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
