Re: [REPOST] "apm: suspend: Unable to enter requested state" after 2.5.31 (incl. 2.6.0testX)
From: Charles Lepple (clepple_at_ghz.cc)
Date: 07/30/03
- Previous message: Con Kolivas: "Re: [PATCH] O10int for interactivity"
- In reply to: Stephen Rothwell: "Re: [REPOST] "apm: suspend: Unable to enter requested state" after 2.5.31 (incl. 2.6.0testX)"
- Next in thread: Stephen Rothwell: "Re: [REPOST] "apm: suspend: Unable to enter requested state" after 2.5.31 (incl. 2.6.0testX)"
- Reply: Stephen Rothwell: "Re: [REPOST] "apm: suspend: Unable to enter requested state" after 2.5.31 (incl. 2.6.0testX)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 21:38:25 -0400 To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
On Tuesday, July 29, 2003, at 09:05 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> I may have missed this, but do you have the APIC or IO-APIC enabled?
Not sure that I have one on this system... it's pre-i686 (Pentium MMX).
I left the laptop at work, so I don't have dmesg output nearby.
> The patch in question merely moved where the 0x40 descriptor was
> installed
> in the descriptor table.
You mean it appears at a different table index? For some reason, I
thought that was a different patch (but I can't seem to find anything
else from that time period).
[snip]
> The base and limit parts of the descriptor get initialised at run time
> by
> the code:
>
> set_base(bad_bios_desc, __va((unsigned long)0x40 << 4));
> _set_limit((char *)&bad_bios_desc, 4095 - (0x40 << 4));
>
> These could be set statically, but it was easier to use the availble
> macros.
Do you think it's worth checking the initialized value of the
bad_bios_desc fields in a 2.5 kernel with working APM? Or do you have
any other ideas on where to look?
thanks for taking the time to explain this,
-- Charles Lepple <ghz.cc!clepple> http://www.ghz.cc/charles/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Con Kolivas: "Re: [PATCH] O10int for interactivity"
- In reply to: Stephen Rothwell: "Re: [REPOST] "apm: suspend: Unable to enter requested state" after 2.5.31 (incl. 2.6.0testX)"
- Next in thread: Stephen Rothwell: "Re: [REPOST] "apm: suspend: Unable to enter requested state" after 2.5.31 (incl. 2.6.0testX)"
- Reply: Stephen Rothwell: "Re: [REPOST] "apm: suspend: Unable to enter requested state" after 2.5.31 (incl. 2.6.0testX)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
