Re: [PATCH] O11int for interactivity

From: Con Kolivas (kernel_at_kolivas.org)
Date: 07/30/03

  • Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: PATCH: Race in 2.6.0-test2 timer code" 
    To: Voluspa <lista1@telia.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Date:	Wed, 30 Jul 2003 20:51:33 +1000

    On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 20:31, Voluspa wrote:
    > On 2003-07-30 8:41:46 Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
    > > Wops! Wait a minute! O11.1 is great, but I've had a few XMMS skips
    > > that I didn't have with O10. They're really difficult to reproduce,
    >
    > Can't reproduce your skips here with my light environment and O11.1 (on
    > a PII 400, 128 meg mem, no desktop, Enlightenment as wm). Even as I
    > write this my machine is under the most extreme load that I have -
    > natural, not artificial:

    Good test. Thanks.

    > As to difference between O10 and O11.1 in feel... No comment. I'm too
    > old to catch such small variations.

    That's good, most of the difference was supposed to be in extremely unusual
    circumstances. Felipe's issue is something I was concerned might happen (not
    specifically an audio issue per se but audio is a sensitive way to pick it
    up) which is why all testing is important.

    Con

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  • Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: PATCH: Race in 2.6.0-test2 timer code"