Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386
From: Adrian Bunk (bunk_at_fs.tum.de)
Date: 07/30/03
- Previous message: Ville Herva: "Re: 2.4.22pre8 hangs too (Re: 2.4.21-jam1, aic7xxx-6.2.36: solid hangs)"
- In reply to: Jan-Benedict Glaw: "TSCs are a no-no on i386"
- Next in thread: Mike Fedyk: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
- Reply: Mike Fedyk: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
- Reply: Jan-Benedict Glaw: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 20:10:06 +0200 To: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 03:56:23PM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
>...
> Please apply. Worst to say, even Debian seems to start using i486+
> features (ie. libstdc++5 is SIGILLed on Am386 because there's no
> "lock" insn available)...
Shouldn't the 486 emulation in the latest 386 kernel images in Debian
unstable take care of this?
> MfG, JBG
>...
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Ville Herva: "Re: 2.4.22pre8 hangs too (Re: 2.4.21-jam1, aic7xxx-6.2.36: solid hangs)"
- In reply to: Jan-Benedict Glaw: "TSCs are a no-no on i386"
- Next in thread: Mike Fedyk: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
- Reply: Mike Fedyk: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
- Reply: Jan-Benedict Glaw: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
