Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386
From: Jan-Benedict Glaw (jbglaw_at_lug-owl.de)
Date: 07/30/03
- Previous message: Pavel Machek: "Re: [2.6.0-test-ac3] ACPI + sensors => health chip flatlines"
- In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
- Next in thread: J.A. Magallon: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
- Reply: J.A. Magallon: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
- Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
- Reply: Adrian Bunk: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 22:33:18 +0200 To: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
On Wed, 2003-07-30 21:01:00 +0100, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
wrote in message <1059595260.10447.6.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk>:
> On Mer, 2003-07-30 at 19:45, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Note that this can also allow Step-A 486's to correctly run multi-thread
> > applications since cmpxchg has a wrong opcode on this early CPU.
> >
> > Don't use this to enable multi-threading on an SMP machine, the lock
> > atomicity can't be guaranted!
>
> The bigger problem (and certainly with some of the cmov emulation hacks
> I've seen) is getting the security checking right when you need to
> reprocess the user data - another reason to do it in userspace with a
> preload 8)
Well... For sure, I can write a LD_PRELOAD lib dealing with SIGILL, but
how do I enable it for the whole system. That is, I'd need to give
LD_PRELOAD=xxx at the kernel's boot prompt to have it as en environment
variable for each and every process?
That sounds a tad inelegant to me. Really, I'd prefer to see libstdc++
be compiled for i386 ...
...and IFF those new opcodes bring _that_ much performance, then we
should think about another Debian distribution for i686-linux. Up to
now, I was really proud of having _one_ distribution that's basically
capable of running on all and any machines I own...
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@lug-owl.de . +49-172-7608481
"Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg
fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! | im Irak!
ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(IRAQ_WAR_2 | DRM | TCPA));
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Pavel Machek: "Re: [2.6.0-test-ac3] ACPI + sensors => health chip flatlines"
- In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
- Next in thread: J.A. Magallon: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
- Reply: J.A. Magallon: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
- Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
- Reply: Adrian Bunk: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
