Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386
From: Alan Cox (alan_at_lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: 07/31/03
- Previous message: Pavel Machek: "Re: Warn about taskfile?"
- In reply to: Jan-Benedict Glaw: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
- Next in thread: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
- Reply: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
- Reply: Jan-Benedict Glaw: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de> Date: 31 Jul 2003 00:05:53 +0100
On Mer, 2003-07-30 at 21:33, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> Well... For sure, I can write a LD_PRELOAD lib dealing with SIGILL, but
> how do I enable it for the whole system. That is, I'd need to give
> LD_PRELOAD=xxx at the kernel's boot prompt to have it as en environment
> variable for each and every process?
/etc/ld.preload
> That sounds a tad inelegant to me. Really, I'd prefer to see libstdc++
> be compiled for i386 ...
True
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Pavel Machek: "Re: Warn about taskfile?"
- In reply to: Jan-Benedict Glaw: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
- Next in thread: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
- Reply: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
- Reply: Jan-Benedict Glaw: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
