Re: [2.6 patch] let broken drivers depend on BROKEN{,ON_SMP}
From: John Bradford (john_at_grabjohn.com)
Date: 07/31/03
- Previous message: Tomas Szepe: "Re: module-init-tools don't support gzipped modules."
- Maybe in reply to: Adrian Bunk: "[2.6 patch] let broken drivers depend on BROKEN{,ON_SMP}"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 10:41:16 +0100 To: bunk@fs.tum.de, szepe@pinerecords.com
> > > > If a _user_ of a stable kernel notices "it doesn't even compile" this
> > > > gives a very bad impression of the quality of the Linux kernel.
> > >
> > > The keyword in this sentence is "stable."
> > > Could you maybe come up with this again at around 2.6.40? :)
> >
> > The first stable kernel of the 2.6 kernel series will be 2.6.0.
>
> There are going to be a zillion drivers that don't compile by the
> time 2.6.0 is released, which is precisely when lkml will see a whole
> new wave of people willing to fix things so I really don't think
> hiding the problems behind CONFIG_BROKEN or whatever is reasonable.
They would simply stay behind CONFIG_BROKEN for longer, because fewer
people would test them.
Also, remember that some things might only give compile errors under
certain circumstances. The _vast_ majority of kernels include TCP/IP
support, for example, so something that breaks when it's not
configured could easily go unnoticed for ages - does that mean it
should be put behind CONFIG_BROKEN when it's discovered?
John.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Tomas Szepe: "Re: module-init-tools don't support gzipped modules."
- Maybe in reply to: Adrian Bunk: "[2.6 patch] let broken drivers depend on BROKEN{,ON_SMP}"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
