2.6.0-test2 device mapper patchset
From: Joe Thornber (thornber_at_sistina.com)
Date: 07/31/03
- Previous message: Raj Inguva: "Re: atomic_set & gcc. atomicity question"
- Next in thread: Joe Thornber: "[Patch 1/6] dm: don't use MODULE_PARM"
- Reply: Joe Thornber: "[Patch 1/6] dm: don't use MODULE_PARM"
- Reply: Joe Thornber: "[Patch 2/6] dm: remove blk.h include"
- Reply: Joe Thornber: "[Patch 3/6] dm: decimal device num sscanf"
- Reply: Joe Thornber: "[Patch 4/6] dm: 64 bit ioctl fixes"
- Reply: Joe Thornber: "[Patch 6/6] dm: use sector_div()"
- Reply: Joe Thornber: "[Patch 5/6] dm: missing #include"
- Reply: Joe Thornber: "Re: [Patch 7/6 (so I can't count)] dm: resume() name clash"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:45:17 +0100 To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>, Linux Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, thornber@sistina.com
A straight forward set of fixes, please merge.
- Joe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Raj Inguva: "Re: atomic_set & gcc. atomicity question"
- Next in thread: Joe Thornber: "[Patch 1/6] dm: don't use MODULE_PARM"
- Reply: Joe Thornber: "[Patch 1/6] dm: don't use MODULE_PARM"
- Reply: Joe Thornber: "[Patch 2/6] dm: remove blk.h include"
- Reply: Joe Thornber: "[Patch 3/6] dm: decimal device num sscanf"
- Reply: Joe Thornber: "[Patch 4/6] dm: 64 bit ioctl fixes"
- Reply: Joe Thornber: "[Patch 6/6] dm: use sector_div()"
- Reply: Joe Thornber: "[Patch 5/6] dm: missing #include"
- Reply: Joe Thornber: "Re: [Patch 7/6 (so I can't count)] dm: resume() name clash"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
