fun or real: proc interface for module handling?
From: Nico Schottelius (nico-kernel_at_schottelius.org)
Date: 07/31/03
- Previous message: Jens Axboe: "Re: 2.6.0-test2+ext3+dbench=Buffer I/O error"
- Next in thread: Måns Rullgård: "Re: fun or real: proc interface for module handling?"
- Reply: Måns Rullgård: "Re: fun or real: proc interface for module handling?"
- Reply: Yaroslav Rastrigin: "Re: fun or real: proc interface for module handling?"
- Maybe reply: John Bradford: "Re: fun or real: proc interface for module handling?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 14:12:48 +0200 To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Hello!
I was just joking around here, but what do you think about this idea:
A proc interface for module handling:
/proc/mods/
/proc/mods/<module-name>/<link-to-the-modules-use-us>
So we could try to load a module with
mkdir /proc/mods/ipv6
and remove it and every module which uses us with
rm -r /proc/mods/ipv6
Modul options could be passed my
echo "psmouse_noext=1" > /proc/mods/psmouse/options
which would also make it possible to change module options while running..
It's just an idea, perhaps someone likes this..
perhaps if there is enough feedback I even could think about
implementing it.
Greetings'
Nico
ps: please CC, the majordomo isn't answering my subscribe requests..
-- echo God bless America | sed 's/.*\(A.*\)$/Why \1?/' pgp: new id: 0x8D0E27A4 | ftp.schottelius.org/pub/familiy/nico/pgp-key.new
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Jens Axboe: "Re: 2.6.0-test2+ext3+dbench=Buffer I/O error"
- Next in thread: Måns Rullgård: "Re: fun or real: proc interface for module handling?"
- Reply: Måns Rullgård: "Re: fun or real: proc interface for module handling?"
- Reply: Yaroslav Rastrigin: "Re: fun or real: proc interface for module handling?"
- Maybe reply: John Bradford: "Re: fun or real: proc interface for module handling?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|