Re: 2.6.0-test2+Util-linux/cryptoapi
From: Frank v Waveren (fvw_at_var.cx)
Date: 07/31/03
- Previous message: Dave Olien: "Re: [PATCH] sparse function pointer arguments now accept void pointers"
- In reply to: James Morris: "Re: 2.6.0-test2+Util-linux/cryptoapi"
- Next in thread: Andries.Brouwer_at_cwi.nl: "Re: 2.6.0-test2+Util-linux/cryptoapi"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 18:37:18 +0200 To: James Morris <jmorris@intercode.com.au>
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 03:20:48PM +1000, James Morris wrote:
> > Owch. But I assume this didn't sneak in since the testing cryptoAPI
> > patches? Or have the algorithms been redone?
> I'm not sure what you mean.
I'm currently using hvr's testing cryptoAPI patches for 2.4.x, and I
have a block device encrypted with 256 bits serpent. This cannot be
correctly decrypted with linux-2.6.0-test2. Has something in the use
of serpent changed since then (or has block numbering changed again)?
Or should I go bug-hunting?
-- Frank v Waveren Fingerprint: 21A7 C7F3 fvw@[var.cx|stack.nl|chello.nl] ICQ#10074100 1FF3 47FF 545C CB53 Public key: hkp://wwwkeys.pgp.net/fvw@var.cx 7BD9 09C0 3AC1 6DF2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Dave Olien: "Re: [PATCH] sparse function pointer arguments now accept void pointers"
- In reply to: James Morris: "Re: 2.6.0-test2+Util-linux/cryptoapi"
- Next in thread: Andries.Brouwer_at_cwi.nl: "Re: 2.6.0-test2+Util-linux/cryptoapi"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
