Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386
From: Alan Cox (alan_at_lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: 07/31/03
- Previous message: crh_at_samba.org: "Follow-up: Linux, Dell Access Point, and the GPL."
- In reply to: Jamie Lokier: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
- Next in thread: Jan-Benedict Glaw: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org> Date: 31 Jul 2003 20:10:43 +0100
On Iau, 2003-07-31 at 19:37, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> I wouldn't be surprised if even real CPUs mis-decode when there's a
> concurrent DMA into the area they are reading instructions from! :)
I believe there is a PIII errata about putting an instruction across
a memory type boundary and executingit in a loop
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: crh_at_samba.org: "Follow-up: Linux, Dell Access Point, and the GPL."
- In reply to: Jamie Lokier: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
- Next in thread: Jan-Benedict Glaw: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]