Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: OHCI problems with suspend/resume
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt (benh_at_kernel.crashing.org)
Date: 07/31/03
- Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: Disk performance degradation"
- In reply to: David Brownell: "Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: OHCI problems with suspend/resume"
- Next in thread: Benjamin Herrenschmidt: "Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: OHCI problems with suspend/resume"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net> Date: 31 Jul 2003 23:25:41 +0200
On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 15:23, David Brownell wrote:
> Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> >
> >> - APM uses the pm_*() calls for a vetoable check,
> >> never issues SAVE_STATE, then goes POWER_DOWN.
> >
> >
> > I remember the reason... SAVE_STATE expects user processes to be
> > stopped, which is not the case in APM. Perhaps that is easy to fix
> > these days...
> > Pavel
>
>
> That SAVE_STATE restriction doesn't seem to be documented...
Because it is plain wrong ;)
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: Disk performance degradation"
- In reply to: David Brownell: "Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: OHCI problems with suspend/resume"
- Next in thread: Benjamin Herrenschmidt: "Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: OHCI problems with suspend/resume"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|