Re: TI yenta-alikes (was: ToPIC specific init for yenta_socket)
From: Alan Cox (alan_at_lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: 08/07/03
- Previous message: aa12.bbs2_at_bbs.yzu.edu.tw: "immediate value for you"
- In reply to: Russell King: "Re: TI yenta-alikes (was: ToPIC specific init for yenta_socket)"
- Next in thread: Tim Small: "Re: TI yenta-alikes"
- Reply: Tim Small: "Re: TI yenta-alikes"
- Reply: Russell King: "Re: TI yenta-alikes (was: ToPIC specific init for yenta_socket)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Date: 07 Aug 2003 13:18:15 +0100
On Iau, 2003-08-07 at 10:02, Russell King wrote:
> doing is *wrong*. The only people who know whether the pin has been
> wired for INTA or IRQ3 are the _designers_ of the hardware, not the
> Linux kernel.
That assumes the yenta controller isnt hotplugged.
> Currently, the Linux kernel assumes a "greater than designers" approach
> to fiddling with the registers which control the function of these pins,
> and so far I've seen:
>
> - changing the mode from serial PCI interrupts to parallel PCI interrupts
> causes the machine to lock hard (since some cardbus controllers use the
> same physical pins for both functions.)
Basically we got burned by changing the IRQMUX register rather than just
using it as an information source.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: aa12.bbs2_at_bbs.yzu.edu.tw: "immediate value for you"
- In reply to: Russell King: "Re: TI yenta-alikes (was: ToPIC specific init for yenta_socket)"
- Next in thread: Tim Small: "Re: TI yenta-alikes"
- Reply: Tim Small: "Re: TI yenta-alikes"
- Reply: Russell King: "Re: TI yenta-alikes (was: ToPIC specific init for yenta_socket)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|