Re: /proc/stat's intr field looks odd, although /proc/interrupts seems correct
From: Robert Love (rml_at_tech9.net)
Date: 08/11/03
- Previous message: Randy.Dunlap: "Re: /proc/stat's intr field looks odd, although /proc/interrupts seems correct"
- In reply to: Randy.Dunlap: "Re: /proc/stat's intr field looks odd, although /proc/interrupts seems correct"
- Next in thread: Randy.Dunlap: "Re: /proc/stat's intr field looks odd, although /proc/interrupts seems correct"
- Reply: Randy.Dunlap: "Re: /proc/stat's intr field looks odd, although /proc/interrupts seems correct"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org> Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 21:35:17 -0700
On Sun, 2003-08-10 at 21:33, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> Ugh-ly? We can move it to sysfs and then change the file format
> to intnum:count pairs (e.g.).
But then how is it different from /proc/interrupts ?
Robert Love
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Randy.Dunlap: "Re: /proc/stat's intr field looks odd, although /proc/interrupts seems correct"
- In reply to: Randy.Dunlap: "Re: /proc/stat's intr field looks odd, although /proc/interrupts seems correct"
- Next in thread: Randy.Dunlap: "Re: /proc/stat's intr field looks odd, although /proc/interrupts seems correct"
- Reply: Randy.Dunlap: "Re: /proc/stat's intr field looks odd, although /proc/interrupts seems correct"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
