Re: [PATCH] Make modules work in Linus' tree on ARM

From: Russell King (rmk_at_arm.linux.org.uk)
Date: 08/14/03

  • Next message: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: [PATCH] call drv->shutdown at rmmod"
    Date:	Thu, 14 Aug 2003 17:32:49 +0100
    To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
    
    

    On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 09:19:17AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    >
    > On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Russell King wrote:
    > >
    > > After reviewing the /proc/kcore and kclist issues, I've decided that I'm
    > > no longer prepared to even _think_ about supporting /proc/kcore on ARM -
    >
    > I suspect we should just remove it altogether.
    >
    > Does anybody actually _use_ /proc/kcore? It was one of those "cool
    > feature" things, but I certainly haven't ever used it myself except for
    > testing, and it's historically often been broken after various kernel
    > infrastructure updates, and people haven't complained..

    I was thinking afterwards about a patch to allow /proc/kcore to be
    entirely disabled and dropped out of the kernel - we already select
    between a.out and ELF.

    -- 
    Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)                The developer of ARM Linux
                 http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
    

  • Next message: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: [PATCH] call drv->shutdown at rmmod"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: [PATCH] Blacklist binary-only modules lying about their license
      ... > agree that, technically, thunking to BIOS code also taints the kernel, ... > because it, too, is a black box which could corrupt the kernel. ... At least i trouble with this "feature"! ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: Obvious one-liner - Use 3DNOW on MK8
      ... I'm guessing the kernel handles it correctly ... Might want to check other arches for the same bug. ... which is the only feature this CONFIG controls. ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: [-mm patch] seccomp: dont say it was more or less mandatory
      ... >> You don't need this feature unless you know you need it. ... > unsure while they configure the kernel I certainly prefer that they set ... There had been need of rain for many days. ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: [PATCH] Make modules work in Linus tree on ARM
      ... > I suspect we should just remove it altogether. ... > feature" things, but I certainly haven't ever used it myself except for ... and it's historically often been broken after various kernel ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: [RFC][PATCH} 2.6 and grsecurity
      ... code changes if the feature wasn't selected. ... an 'echo 0>' is a lot less disruptive than a full reboot. ... The other reason is for distribution - if you're building a kernel for a bunch ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)