(no subject)
warudkar_at_vsnl.net
Date: 08/28/03
- Previous message: Larry McVoy: "Re: [PATCH] 2.6.0-test4 -- add context switch counters"
- Next in thread: Vid Strpic: "Re: (no subject)"
- Maybe reply: Vid Strpic: "Re: (no subject)"
- Reply: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: your mail"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 21:25:23 -0500 (GMT) To: kernel@kolivas.org, wli@holomorphy.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is) Con - With swappiness set to 100, the apps do start up in 3 minutes and kswapd doesn't hog the CPU. But X is still unusable till all of them have started up.
Wli - Sorry, vmstat segfaults on 2.6!
kernel@kolivas.org wrote
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 07:38, warudkar@vsnl.net wrote:
> Trying out 2.6.0-test4-mm1. Inside KDE, I start OpenOffice.org, Rational
> Rose and Konsole at a time. All of these take extremely long time to
> startup. (approx > 5 minutes). Kswapd hogs the CPU all the time. X becomes
> unusable till all of them startup, although I can telnet and run top. Same
> thing run under 2.4.18 starts up in 3 minutes, X stays usable and kswapd
> never take more than 2% CPU.
Yes I can reproduce this with a memory heavy load as well on low memory
(linking at the end of a big kernel compile is standard problem). I actually
found the best workaround was to increase the swappiness instead of
decreasing it.
Try
echo 100 > /proc/sys/vm/swappiness
time it
then try
echo 0 > /proc/sys/vm/swappiness
you'll see that at low swappiness kswapd0 can use ridiculous amounts of cpu
trying to avoid swap. The default is 60.
Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Larry McVoy: "Re: [PATCH] 2.6.0-test4 -- add context switch counters"
- Next in thread: Vid Strpic: "Re: (no subject)"
- Maybe reply: Vid Strpic: "Re: (no subject)"
- Reply: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: your mail"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|