Re: PCI PM & compatibility
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt (benh_at_kernel.crashing.org)
Date: 08/28/03
- Previous message: Timo Sirainen: "Re: Lockless file reading"
- In reply to: Patrick Mochel: "Re: PCI PM & compatibility"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Patrick Mochel <mochel@osdl.org> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 10:39:00 +0200
On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 01:29, Patrick Mochel wrote:
> I don't understand. We suspend the children before we suspend the device,
> so as long as all the children go done, so will the parent device.
Forget it... It had crap in mind. Anyway, my point was actually the
opposite than what I wrote :( I was really to make sure that if a
device is "held" up by pm_users beeing non-NULL, it's _parents_
(and not it's children, sorry about the confusion), are also held
non-suspended... I think I'll sleep a bit and then just go look at
the code ;)
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Timo Sirainen: "Re: Lockless file reading"
- In reply to: Patrick Mochel: "Re: PCI PM & compatibility"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
