Re: 2.6.0-test4 and hardware reports a non fatal incident
From: Dave Jones (davej_at_redhat.com)
Date: 08/30/03
- Previous message: Gabriel Paubert: "Re: [2.4] gcc3 warns about type-punned pointers ?"
- In reply to: Randy.Dunlap: "Re: 2.6.0-test4 and hardware reports a non fatal incident"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 14:10:41 +0100 To: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 03:17:08PM -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> | As a result, I'm still no more enlightened. I can't quite figure out from
> | reading the parser what values to put where, as it seems to expect a few
> | more than I have. Any tips?
>
> Yes, the kernel has decided that your processor only has 1 Bank of
> MCE register data to report. I don't know how/why. Sorry.
The non-fatal checker dumps the single bank that is reporting failures.
parsemce should still have enough info there to decode into something
useful however. (just use 0 for the address).
Dave
-- Dave Jones http://www.codemonkey.org.uk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Gabriel Paubert: "Re: [2.4] gcc3 warns about type-punned pointers ?"
- In reply to: Randy.Dunlap: "Re: 2.6.0-test4 and hardware reports a non fatal incident"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]