Re: /proc/ioports overrun patch
From: Marcelo Tosatti (marcelo_at_conectiva.com.br)
Date: 08/30/03
- Previous message: Larry McVoy: "Re: bandwidth for bkbits.net (good news)"
- Maybe in reply to: Marcelo Tosatti: "/proc/ioports overrun patch"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 12:02:49 -0300 (BRT) To: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
> If so, I would prefer to have a fix which outputs the full resource
> information. For that we would need seq_file().
> I have a patch that converts /proc/interrupts to use seq_file as well,
> however it would be much cleaner if Randy's backport of the "single"
> interface went in first
>http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0308.3/0296.html
>Are you planning on taking that patch? Or should I just resend my patch
> w/o it?
I applied the seq file single interfaces now.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Larry McVoy: "Re: bandwidth for bkbits.net (good news)"
- Maybe in reply to: Marcelo Tosatti: "/proc/ioports overrun patch"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|