Re: [PATCH] check_gcc for i386
From: Kurt Wall (kwall_at_kurtwerks.com)
Date: 08/31/03
- Previous message: jw schultz: "Re: [FS Benchmark] reiser4 vs. reiserfs (3.6)"
- In reply to: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] check_gcc for i386"
- Next in thread: Marcelo Tosatti: "Re: [PATCH] check_gcc for i386"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 20:59:57 -0400 To: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Quoth Jeff Garzik:
>
> Yep. I introduced check_gcc into 2.4 (backported from 2.5), in fact.
>
> The above change does exactly what Alan describes, and is a patch I was
> planning to submit myself :) I did not want to change compiler options
> at the time when I submitted the check_gcc patch, but after many months
> of manually patching to get the best compiler flags, it seems solid.
[nod]
Works fine here with a Pentium II, Pentium III, and an Athlon.
Kurt
-- Boy, n.: A noise with dirt on it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: jw schultz: "Re: [FS Benchmark] reiser4 vs. reiserfs (3.6)"
- In reply to: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] check_gcc for i386"
- Next in thread: Marcelo Tosatti: "Re: [PATCH] check_gcc for i386"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
