Re: [PATCH 2.4.22-pre1][NET] timer cleanups
From: David S. Miller (davem_at_redhat.com)
Date: 08/31/03
- Previous message: viro_at_parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk: "Re: [PATCH] vmalloc might sleep"
- In reply to: Vinay K Nallamothu: "[PATCH 2.4.22-pre1][NET] timer cleanups"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 20:33:11 -0700 To: Vinay K Nallamothu <vinay-rc@naturesoft.net>
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 21:11:37 +0530
Vinay K Nallamothu <vinay-rc@naturesoft.net> wrote:
> This patch does the following timer code cleanup:
>
> 1. Change del_timer/add_timer to mod_timer
> 2. Use static timer initialisation wherever applicable
I'm not accepting this. In particular, the ip6_flowlabel.c
change is a bad idea because the code remains racey. Someone
submitted a similar move to mod_timer() for ip6_flowlabel
earlier this week so see my comments there about what needs
to occur to fix the code properly.
Just blindly doing these kinds of conversions to mod_timer()
is foolhardy. You need to apply some brains to it to make
sure you really are getting rid of whatever potential races
exist in the code. And in the ip6_flowlabel.c case things are
as buggy as they were before.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: viro_at_parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk: "Re: [PATCH] vmalloc might sleep"
- In reply to: Vinay K Nallamothu: "[PATCH 2.4.22-pre1][NET] timer cleanups"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|