Re: bandwidth for bkbits.net (good news)

From: Andrea Arcangeli (andrea_at_suse.de)
Date: 08/31/03

  • Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: bandwidth for bkbits.net (good news)"
    Date:	Sun, 31 Aug 2003 16:45:05 +0200
    To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
    
    

    On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 02:15:12PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
    > On Sul, 2003-08-31 at 03:56, Larry McVoy wrote:
    > > I'm pretty convinced we can't solve the problem at our end. Maybe we can
    >
    > For bursts of traffic you can't.

    what's the difference of rejecting packets in software, or because the
    link can't handle them? Assume the guaranteed bandwidth is much lower
    than what the link can provide (very common here during the day), the
    isp will have to do the software thing anyways to balance the bandwidth
    across the different ip.

    it works flawlessy for me and it's the same problem (I also use
    streaming services), and they're unusable until I turn the shaping on,
    I'm sure that if you use the script and you change 1kbyte/sec to
    everything but voip it'll work fine for you too, since basically
    everything else won't pass anymore, it will take ages to open an html
    page and all the bkbits.net users will hang, and the link will be idle
    99% of the time, so voip will take it over as much as it can. I don't
    think it's a matter of "if it works or not", I think it's a matter of
    how much you're ok to lose in terms of global bandwith for all the other
    services but voip.

    the only annoying problem I run into, is that tc is missing a flush
    operation (like iptables -F) but I never need to tweak it anymore so I
    don't mind too much.

    Andrea
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/


  • Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: bandwidth for bkbits.net (good news)"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: bandwidth for bkbits.net (good news)
      ... distance in hops to the sender, it may take up to a few seconds for ... seconds until I get my bandwidth. ... Too slow for VoIP. ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: bandwidth for bkbits.net (good news)
      ... will throttle its sending rate. ... > effective, but if you rate limit hard both ways it has to work, unless ... How about giving something to voip as a hard limit and then using some shaper ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: Setting-up a linux-based router for bandwidth Rashioning
      ... > I recently started subscribing to Packet8 VoIP, and I'd like to find a ... > way to force-feed the needed bandwidth to the Packet8 device so I have ... > Linksys router where it then spreads throughout the house. ... Why does VOIP need more down than up. ...
      (comp.os.linux.networking)
    • Re: bandwidth for bkbits.net (good news)
      ... outgoing acks and their incoming packets for every connection but voip ... but your voip will work. ... and the reason everything makes perfect sense is that ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: Time sliced CFQ io scheduler
      ... >> That is synch write bandwidth. ... before switching to another reader or a writer. ... CFQ may be a bit closer to a traditional elevator behaviour, ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)