Re: [PATCH] Nick's scheduler policy v10
From: Martin J. Bligh (mbligh_at_aracnet.com)
Date: 08/31/03
- Previous message: Marcelo Tosatti: "Re: Freeze with HPT370 2.4.22-rc2 and dxr3"
- In reply to: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: [PATCH] Nick's scheduler policy v10"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 13:41:38 -0700 To: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> Kernbench: (make -j vmlinux, maximal tasks)
> Elapsed System User CPU
> 2.6.0-test4 45.87 116.92 571.10 1499.00
> 2.6.0-test4-nick10 46.91 114.03 584.16 1489.25
Actually, now looks like you have significantly more idle time, so perhaps
the cross-cpu (or cross-node) balancing isn't agressive enough:
4583 10.0% default_idle
2246 1.4% total
377 12.0% zap_pte_range
210 15.2% free_hot_cold_page
161 9.3% buffered_rmqueue
138 47.4% __set_page_dirty_buffers
102 0.7% do_anonymous_page
54 4.9% clear_page_tables
...
-51 -4.3% file_move
-63 -7.9% pte_alloc_one
-63 -3.4% path_lookup
-69 -18.5% .text.lock.file_table
-70 -8.2% strnlen_user
-76 -1.0% __d_lookup
-96 -1.5% page_add_rmap
-104 -16.8% copy_process
-109 -2.9% find_get_page
-118 -28.2% release_task
-267 -18.8% schedule
-357 -6.7% __copy_to_user_ll
-531 -15.2% __copy_from_user_ll
-809 -3.4% page_remove_rmap
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Marcelo Tosatti: "Re: Freeze with HPT370 2.4.22-rc2 and dxr3"
- In reply to: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: [PATCH] Nick's scheduler policy v10"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]