Re: FYI: dbt testing on 2.6.0-test4-mm4 fails

From: Dave Olien (dmo_at_osdl.org)
Date: 09/03/03

  • Next message: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: Scaling noise"
    Date:	Wed, 3 Sep 2003 14:14:41 -0700
    To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
    
    

    Right now, we're looking over older test runs and tracking down exactly
    which patch set seems to have caused a break. We THINK we MIGHT have
    a difference in behavior between mm3 and mm3-1.

    We'll follow this path for a bit and see where it gets us.

    But following that, yes we can put some prink's in and see where
    that leads.

    On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 10:20:42AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > Dave Olien <dmo@osdl.org> wrote:
    > >
    > > I'm just mailing you this to keep you informed, Daniel McNeil and
    > > I are investigating a failure of the dbt database workload test on
    > > 2.6.0-test4-mm4.
    >
    > hmm, the direct-io code hasn't changed significantly since February(!).
    >
    > Which filesystem are you using?
    >
    > One possibility is that some lower-level error occured in the filesystem or
    > the device driver but the error code was not correctly propagated back.
    > Could you sprinkle error-path printk's in the direct-io code?
    >
    >
    > -
    > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/


  • Next message: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: Scaling noise"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: FYI: dbt testing on 2.6.0-test4-mm4 fails
      ... > I are investigating a failure of the dbt database workload test on ... the direct-io code hasn't changed significantly since February. ... Which filesystem are you using? ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status
      ... >> mean that the success rate for crashing kernels is not high enough for ... > other crashdump methods. ... This is not a filesystem but a filesystem + ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4
      ... > Marketed product: a set of hooks, the wider the better, no matter how ... remove these features and make it a "normal" filesystem. ... you changed into a meta directory using ftp and some manage to break ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4
      ... on a sufficiently fast box; don't work when there are ... Remember that the Solaris attribute model is just another filesystem ... inodes that delete themselves when other inodes are changed creep me ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: First impressions of reiserfs4
      ... the sys_statfs64API is broken such that the filesystem can't make ... we can't be guaranteed to fit into the 32-bit f_blocks counts ... Andreas Dilger ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)