Re: 2.6.0test4 bk1 and

From: Andrew Morton (akpm_at_osdl.org)
Date: 09/05/03

  • Next message: Randy.Dunlap: "Re: 2.4.22 -is all patches, is there a tarball of the kernel tree?" 
    Date:	Fri, 5 Sep 2003 08:54:19 -0700
To: Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <arekm@pld-linux.org>

    Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <arekm@pld-linux.org> (by way of Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <arekm@pld-linux.org>) wrote:
    >
    > On Monday 25 of August 2003 15:35, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
    > > Hi,
    > >
    > > Yesterday I've changed kernel from test3 to test4 with bk1 patch applied
    > > and such error appeared (and it's showning all the time):
    > >
    > > bad: scheduling while atomic!
    > > Call Trace:
    > > [<c0105000>] _stext+0x0/0x60
    > > [<c011ccd0>] schedule+0x3b0/0x3c0
    > > [<cf8c1257>] acpi_processor_idle+0xe9/0x1e5 [processor]
    > > [<c0105000>] _stext+0x0/0x60
    > > [<c01090eb>] cpu_idle+0x3b/0x40
    > > [<c0328734>] start_kernel+0x184/0x1b0
    > > [<c0328480>] unknown_bootoption+0x0/0x100
    >
    > Nothing about this has changed in test4bk3 nor test4bk6. Still yells about
    > ,,scheduling while atomic''.
    >
    > No one has idea what's happening here? Some change between test3 and test4
    > did this.

    Grab the latest snapshot from
    http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.5/testing/cset/ (the very first
    link) and see if it's still happening.

    If so then please add the `initcall_debug' option to the kernel boot command line and see if any messages such as

            error in initcall at 0xNNNNNNNN: returned with preemption imbalance

    come out. If they do, look up 0xNNNNNNNN in System.map.

    If none of this sheds any light, please send your full .config.

    Thanks.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  • Next message: Randy.Dunlap: "Re: 2.4.22 -is all patches, is there a tarball of the kernel tree?"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: "scheduling while atomic" ?
      ... > I grab a lock using ... scheduling while atomic: insmod/0x00000001/12692 ... reason do you have a lock from beginning to end? ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • psmouse synchronization loss under load
      ... The pointing device itself is a Synaptics touchpad. ... I'm running a late snapshot of 2.6.0-test11 which for all intents and ... snapshot a few days ago to make sure I could reproduce the problem. ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: Atomic operation for physically moving a page
      ... At the risk of sounding stupid, what problem are you trying to solve by copying ... I know the BKL isn't something you want to grab if you can help it. ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: 2.6.7-mm2
      ... > and of course it does not go to the serial console ...). ... > present I'm unable to grab it. ... Can you grab a trace now? ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: Likelihood of rt_tasks
      ... > A quick question about the usefulness of making rt_taskchecks ... > are scheduling one or many running rt_tasks and the majority of your ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    Loading