Re: [PATCH] 2.6 workaround for Athlon/Opteron prefetch errata
From: Jamie Lokier (jamie_at_shareable.org)
Date: 09/11/03
- Previous message: Russell King: "Re: Virtual alias cache coherency results (was: x86, ARM, PARISC, PPC, MIPS and Sparc folks please run this)"
- In reply to: richard.brunner_at_amd.com: "RE: [PATCH] 2.6 workaround for Athlon/Opteron prefetch errata"
- Next in thread: Martin Schlemmer: "RE: [PATCH] 2.6 workaround for Athlon/Opteron prefetch errata"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 17:55:15 +0100 To: richard.brunner@amd.com
richard.brunner@amd.com wrote:
> Don't worry! I am pretty certain the patch won't impact the
> performance of the 2.6 kernel on processors from other vendors ;-)
is_prefetch() will slow down programs which depend on lots of SEGV
signals: those garbage collectors which use mprotect and SIGSEGV to
track dirty pages.
I wonder how much it will slow them down.
-- Jamie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Russell King: "Re: Virtual alias cache coherency results (was: x86, ARM, PARISC, PPC, MIPS and Sparc folks please run this)"
- In reply to: richard.brunner_at_amd.com: "RE: [PATCH] 2.6 workaround for Athlon/Opteron prefetch errata"
- Next in thread: Martin Schlemmer: "RE: [PATCH] 2.6 workaround for Athlon/Opteron prefetch errata"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|