Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] better i386 CPU selection
From: Adrian Bunk (bunk_at_fs.tum.de)
Date: 09/13/03
- Previous message: Breno: "Re: stack overflow"
- In reply to: Mikael Pettersson: "Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] better i386 CPU selection"
- Next in thread: Maciej W. Rozycki: "Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] better i386 CPU selection"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 01:23:04 +0200 To: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@csd.uu.se>
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 11:38:03PM +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
>...
> GOOD_APIC is Intel P5MMX, Intel P6 and above, and AMD K7 and above.
> Nothing else has GOOD_APIC: P5 Classic because of the bug, and the
> rest because they don't have local APIC at all.
Ah, thanks for this information.
Considering this, I can simply do the following in my proposal of
offering every CPU type to the user?
config X86_BAD_APIC
bool
depends on CPU_586TSC
default y
> /Mikael
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Breno: "Re: stack overflow"
- In reply to: Mikael Pettersson: "Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] better i386 CPU selection"
- Next in thread: Maciej W. Rozycki: "Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] better i386 CPU selection"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
