Re: Can we kill f inb_p, outb_p and other random I/O on port 0x80, in 2.6?
From: John Bradford (john_at_grabjohn.com)
Date: 09/22/03
- Previous message: Sam Ravnborg: "Re: [PATCH] Add 'make uImage' for PPC32"
- Maybe in reply to: Eric W. Biederman: "Can we kill f inb_p, outb_p and other random I/O on port 0x80, in 2.6?"
- Next in thread: Jamie Lokier: "Re: Can we kill f inb_p, outb_p and other random I/O on port 0x80, in 2.6?"
- Reply: Jamie Lokier: "Re: Can we kill f inb_p, outb_p and other random I/O on port 0x80, in 2.6?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 21:03:08 +0100 To: arjanv@redhat.com, ebiederm@xmission.com
> Another reason for fixing this is we are killing who knows how much
> I/O bandwidth with this stream of failing writes to port 0x80.
Assuming we do stop using I/O to port 0x80 for timing purposes, would
it be worth adding code to make existing POST cards double as a poor
man's front panel display once the kernel has booted?
John.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Sam Ravnborg: "Re: [PATCH] Add 'make uImage' for PPC32"
- Maybe in reply to: Eric W. Biederman: "Can we kill f inb_p, outb_p and other random I/O on port 0x80, in 2.6?"
- Next in thread: Jamie Lokier: "Re: Can we kill f inb_p, outb_p and other random I/O on port 0x80, in 2.6?"
- Reply: Jamie Lokier: "Re: Can we kill f inb_p, outb_p and other random I/O on port 0x80, in 2.6?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
