Re: cryptoloop hard lockup 2.6.0-test5-mm4
From: Thiago Rondon (thiago_at_ananke.com.br)
Date: 09/23/03
- Previous message: Hyunje Park: "Packet reordering and blocking problem at gigabit with 2.4 kernel"
- In reply to: Peter Lieverdink: "cryptoloop hard lockup 2.6.0-test5-mm4"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 10:36:24 -0300 To: Peter Lieverdink <cafuego@cafuego.net>
Hi Peter,
Can you please test that?
--- mm/swapfile.c.orig 2003-09-23 09:34:16.000000000 -0400
+++ mm/swapfile.c 2003-09-23 09:34:39.000000000 -0400
@@ -1223,7 +1223,7 @@
unsigned int type;
int i, prev;
int error;
- static int least_priority;
+ static int least_priority = 0;
union swap_header *swap_header = 0;
int swap_header_version;
int nr_good_pages = 0;
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 03:25:47PM +1000, Peter Lieverdink wrote:
> I just had a play with an article from an old LinuxJournal, to see if I
> could set up a cryptoloop homedir on my Debian unstable box. Found making
> an fs on the loop device locks the kernel hard. (need reset button) When
> using loopback without crypto it all works fine.
>
> Ayone else have the same experience?
>
> Using util-linux 2.12, aes (same prob with twofish, blowfish).
>
> Crash dump is attached, as is kernel config. When not running uml-switch,
> the crash still occurs but doesn't print the VM: messages. (I don't have a
> swap partition anyway, so what's that all about?)
>
> - Peter.
> kahlua:~# modprobe cryptoloop
> loop: loaded (max 8 devices)
> kahlua:~# modprobe aes
> kahlua:~# losetup -e aes -k 128 /dev/loop0 /home/cafuego.img
> kahlua:~# mkfs -t ext2 /dev/loop0
> mke2fs 1.35-WIP (21-Aug-2003)
> Filesystem label=
> OS type: Linux
> Block size=1024 (log=0)
> Fragment size=1024 (log=0)
> 131072 inodes, 524288 blocks
> 26214 blocks (5.00%) reserved for the super user
> First data block=1
> 64 block groups
> 8192 blocks per group, 8192 fragments per group
> 2048 inodes per group
> Superblock backups stored on blocks:
> 8193, 24577, 40961, 57345, 73729, 204801, 221185, 401409
>
> Writing inode tables: done
> Writing superblocks and filesystem accounting information: do_wp_page: bogus page at address 0804d056
> VM: killing process uml_switch
> swap_dup: Bad swap file entry 90885fdb
> VM: killing process uml_switch
> swap_dup: Bad swap file entry 286be58f
> VM: killing process uml_switch
> Debug: sleeping fucntion called from invalid context at include/linux/rwsem.h:43
> in_atomic():0, irqs_disabled():1
> Call Trace:
-- -Thiago Rondon, MAKETRADEFAIR.ORG - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Hyunje Park: "Packet reordering and blocking problem at gigabit with 2.4 kernel"
- In reply to: Peter Lieverdink: "cryptoloop hard lockup 2.6.0-test5-mm4"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]