Re: log-buf-len dynamic
From: Linus Torvalds (torvalds_at_osdl.org)
Date: 09/24/03
- Previous message: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: [TRIVIAL] Fix comment in parse_hex_value"
- In reply to: Larry McVoy: "Re: log-buf-len dynamic"
- Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: log-buf-len dynamic"
- Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: log-buf-len dynamic"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 20:54:41 -0700 (PDT) To: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>
Larry, I think you remember the good old days of SunOS, when 16MB of RAM
was a lot, and people expected less of their hardware. In particular,
interactive programs used to have a _tiny_ footprint. Often even under X.
Then we put Solaris, Motif and CDE on those suckers, and it was horrible.
Yeah, SunOS was nice. But I really think it's the access patterns that
changed.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: [TRIVIAL] Fix comment in parse_hex_value"
- In reply to: Larry McVoy: "Re: log-buf-len dynamic"
- Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: log-buf-len dynamic"
- Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: log-buf-len dynamic"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|