Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] disallow modular IPv6
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo (acme_at_conectiva.com.br)
Date: 09/29/03
- Previous message: Whit Blauvelt: "Re: PROBLEM: Strange active ftp failure - adendum"
- In reply to: Adrian Bunk: "RFC: [2.6 patch] disallow modular IPv6"
- Next in thread: Adrian Bunk: "Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] disallow modular IPv6"
- Reply: Adrian Bunk: "Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] disallow modular IPv6"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 20:18:42 -0300 To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Em Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 12:59:41AM +0200, Adrian Bunk escreveu:
> It seems modular IPv6 doesn't work 100% reliable, e.g. after looking at
> the code it doesn't seem to be a good idea to compile a kernel without
> IPv6 support and later build and install IPv6 modules. Is there a great
> need for modular IPv6 or is the patch below to disallow modular IPv6 OK?
Please, don't... We're going in the all modules direction, not the other
way around, distro (general purpose) kernels would get big bloat in the
static kernel.
- Arnaldo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Whit Blauvelt: "Re: PROBLEM: Strange active ftp failure - adendum"
- In reply to: Adrian Bunk: "RFC: [2.6 patch] disallow modular IPv6"
- Next in thread: Adrian Bunk: "Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] disallow modular IPv6"
- Reply: Adrian Bunk: "Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] disallow modular IPv6"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
