Re: pm: Revert swsusp to 2.6.0-test3
From: Mark W. Alexander (slash_at_dotnetslash.net)
Date: 09/30/03
- Previous message: Sébastien Villemot: "[2.6.0-test6] broken IDE modules support"
- In reply to: Patrick Mochel: "Re: pm: Revert swsusp to 2.6.0-test3"
- Next in thread: Nigel Cunningham: "Re: pm: Revert swsusp to 2.6.0-test3"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 21:16:42 -0400 (EDT) To: Patrick Mochel <mochel@osdl.org>
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Patrick Mochel wrote:
>
> > Are both versions compatible? How to resume the right version?
> > Or simply resume=/dev/hda3 and the kernel will pick the right
> > mechanism to resume?
>
> No, they are not compatible. The resume= command line parameter will be
> trapped by the swsusp code. When using pmdisk, you may set the partition
> you want to use for suspend/resume via the CONFIG_PMDISK_PARTITION
> compile-time option. Or, you may override that using the pmdisk= command
> line parameter.
>
> I realize it's a bit confusing, but I will write documentation that
> explicitly describes the differences within the week.
While you're at it, please throw in some notes about how to resume from
memory too. I just started playing with it and, although it suspends
great I see no obvious way to wake it up. (Power button flashes lights
once on & off. Next power press reboots.)
-- Mark W. Alexander slash@dotnetslash.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Sébastien Villemot: "[2.6.0-test6] broken IDE modules support"
- In reply to: Patrick Mochel: "Re: pm: Revert swsusp to 2.6.0-test3"
- Next in thread: Nigel Cunningham: "Re: pm: Revert swsusp to 2.6.0-test3"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]