Re: bk2svn repo updatedness?
From: John Bradford (john_at_grabjohn.com)
Date: 09/30/03
- Previous message: Jens Axboe: "Re: Kernel includefile bug not fixed after a year :-("
- In reply to: Wade: "Re: bk2svn repo updatedness?"
- Next in thread: Larry McVoy: "Re: bk2svn repo updatedness?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 12:18:10 +0100 To: Wade <neroz@ii.net>, Jani Monoses <jani@iv.ro>
Quote from Wade <neroz@ii.net>:
> Jani Monoses wrote:
> > How timely should the sources in the subversion repo of the 2.6 kernel
> > be? I see that right now they are almost 2 days behind linux.bkbits.net
> >
> > thanks
> > Jani
> >
>
> Depends if Larry is in a good mood or not.
Don't post flamebait - Larry posted to the list a few days ago stating
that he is busy with non work things at the moment.
If there is a problem with the Bit Keeper repositories, have you
contacted anyone at Bit Mover, as he suggested?
John.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Jens Axboe: "Re: Kernel includefile bug not fixed after a year :-("
- In reply to: Wade: "Re: bk2svn repo updatedness?"
- Next in thread: Larry McVoy: "Re: bk2svn repo updatedness?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
