Re: -mregparm=3 (was Re: [PATCH] i386 do_machine_check() is redundant.
From: Robert Love (rml_at_tech9.net)
Date: 09/30/03
- Previous message: Randy.Dunlap: "Re: make install problems"
- In reply to: Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu: "Re: -mregparm=3 (was Re: [PATCH] i386 do_machine_check() is redundant."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 11:48:19 -0400
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 10:37, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> Well, abs() is the only one I tripped over in my config. I'm sure there's others
> lurking elsewhere in the kernel tree.
There are not _too_ many builtins. abs, strcpy, et cetera ...
> The bigger question is whether a patch to support -ffreestanding would be a
> good idea - with proper use of the __builtin_* stuff it *should* work, and it will
> hopefully cause better kernel code hygiene..
I agree. We should go for it.
Robert Love
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Randy.Dunlap: "Re: make install problems"
- In reply to: Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu: "Re: -mregparm=3 (was Re: [PATCH] i386 do_machine_check() is redundant."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
