Re: -mregparm=3 (was Re: [PATCH] i386 do_machine_check() is redundant.
From: Linus Torvalds (torvalds_at_osdl.org)
Date: 09/30/03
- Previous message: Bill Davidsen: "Re: [PATCH] Athlon Prefetch workaround for 2.6.0test6"
- In reply to: Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu: "Re: -mregparm=3 (was Re: [PATCH] i386 do_machine_check() is redundant."
- Next in thread: Mikulas Patocka: "-mregparm=3 (was Re: [PATCH] i386 do_machine_check() is redundant."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 08:48:01 -0700 (PDT) To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
>
> Well, they do have an open interface. I've apparently just not gotten all the
> __attribute((regparm(0))) in the right places yet. ;)
They may have some places inside the binary part that call directly out
to the kernel, and use the wrong calling conventions.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Bill Davidsen: "Re: [PATCH] Athlon Prefetch workaround for 2.6.0test6"
- In reply to: Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu: "Re: -mregparm=3 (was Re: [PATCH] i386 do_machine_check() is redundant."
- Next in thread: Mikulas Patocka: "-mregparm=3 (was Re: [PATCH] i386 do_machine_check() is redundant."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
