2.4.x performance tests Re: [PATCH] BUG() in exec_mmap()
From: Marcelo Tosatti (marcelo.tosatti_at_cyclades.com)
Date: 10/09/03
- Previous message: Martin J. Bligh: "[Bug 1338] New: 2.6.0-test7 oops in proc_pid_stat"
- Next in thread: Ernie Petrides: "Re: 2.4.x performance tests Re: [PATCH] BUG() in exec_mmap()"
- Maybe reply: Ernie Petrides: "Re: 2.4.x performance tests Re: [PATCH] BUG() in exec_mmap()"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 17:25:52 -0300 (BRT) To: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com>
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
>
> > Marcelo,
> > A recent change to exec_mmap() removed the initialization of old_mm,
> > leaving an uninitialized use of it. This patch would completely remove
> > old_mm from the function. Is this what was intended?
>
> Yes.
>
> Blame me... patch applied, thank you!
BTW, further performance testing of the removal of this optimization is
VERY welcome.
I've done some tests and no big performance harm has showed up, but thats
just me.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Martin J. Bligh: "[Bug 1338] New: 2.6.0-test7 oops in proc_pid_stat"
- Next in thread: Ernie Petrides: "Re: 2.4.x performance tests Re: [PATCH] BUG() in exec_mmap()"
- Maybe reply: Ernie Petrides: "Re: 2.4.x performance tests Re: [PATCH] BUG() in exec_mmap()"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|