Re: /proc reliability & performance
From: Zan Lynx (zlynx_at_acm.org)
Date: 10/17/03
- Previous message: Tomas Szepe: "Re: [RFT][PATCH] fix ServerWorks PIO auto-tuning"
- In reply to: Albert Cahalan: "/proc reliability & performance"
- Next in thread: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: /proc reliability & performance"
- Reply: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: /proc reliability & performance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Albert Cahalan <albert@users.sf.net> Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 01:40:03 -0600
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 20:07, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> I created a process with 360 thousand threads,
> went into the /proc/*/task directory, and did
> a simple /bin/ls. It took over 9 minutes on a
> nice fast Opteron.
Did you try using find instead of ls? ls loads all entries and then
sorts them, so it can create an alphabetical display.
Try using find. It will not take quite so long.
-- Zan Lynx <zlynx@acm.org>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part
- Previous message: Tomas Szepe: "Re: [RFT][PATCH] fix ServerWorks PIO auto-tuning"
- In reply to: Albert Cahalan: "/proc reliability & performance"
- Next in thread: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: /proc reliability & performance"
- Reply: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: /proc reliability & performance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
