Re: Blockbusting news, results are in

From: jw schultz (jw_at_pegasys.ws)
Date: 10/20/03

  • Next message: Svetoslav Slavtchev: "Re: HighPoint 374"
    Date:	Mon, 20 Oct 2003 01:22:58 -0700
    To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
    
    

    On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 08:22:59AM +0100, John Bradford wrote:
    > > What is apparently missing is better handling of the
    > > uncorrectable errors. Specifically the ability to pass the
    > > errors and warnings up to the OS for evaluation and for the
    > > OS to be able to request a block remap or to undo a block
    > > remap.
    >
    > Why this suggestion keeping coming up, I have no idea. If you take
    > the idea to it's extreme, it's basically saying that we should
    > off-load all processing on to the host. Although there has been a
    > move towards dumb peripherals in recent years, (E.G. software modems),
    > I have seen almost no even vaguely convincing arguments other than
    > cost as to why they are superior, (lower latency has been mentioned
    > with regard to software modems - I fail to see the benefit, although I
    > suppose it might exist for games players). Apart from some data
    > recovery applications, I don't see how it is possible to do anything
    > really useful simply by adding the ability to pass some warnings and
    > errors up to the OS, without giving the OS access to all of the data
    > that the drive firmware has access to.

    I'm not suggesting the drive off-load it. I'm only
    suggesting that there be a mechanism for the host to be more
    involved if the host is capable.

    The problem that began this thread is a perfect example. A
    bad block that the drive firmware apparently will not remap
    calls for the ability to explicitly instruct the drive to
    remap it. In some cases it might be good to be able to let
    the host countermand a remap if the disk reports overtemp.

    > Obviously drives with completely open and free firmware would be
    > great, but that is not likely to happen in the near future, so for the
    > time being, if you don't like the way drives handle defect management,
    > complain to the manufactuers. I am satisfied with the way Maxtor
    > disks handle defect management, both Eric's explainations and my own
    > observations.

    No disagreement here.

    -- 
    ________________________________________________________________
    	J.W. Schultz            Pegasystems Technologies
    	email address:		jw@pegasys.ws
    		Remember Cernan and Schmitt
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
    

  • Next message: Svetoslav Slavtchev: "Re: HighPoint 374"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Restricting RDP access
      ... You might look at these Group Policies for possible help. ... preclude giving the client the ability to copy files from the remote machine to the local client ... I have the ability to ... > to the drives on their work machines? ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.work_remotely)
    • Re: Blockbusting news, results are in
      ... Specifically the ability to pass the ... > errors and warnings up to the OS for evaluation and for the ... Obviously drives with completely open and free firmware would be ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Power Supply and MB Question
      ... Lian LI PC 201B Case (will handle the eATX MB and 12 or more drives) ... The idea is to run 3 500 gig drives in RAID5 initially, but have the ability to add more as needed. ... So I think that the 700 watt supply will be more than enough for all future needs - I could easily see eventually having 6-7 drives ... and two processors, possibly two graphics cards, although I don't do games, so I really won't need top of the line graphics ...
      (alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt)
    • Re: Ultra160 drive on s/e, narrow bus?
      ... Do modern Ultra160 drives generally have the ability to fall ... back to work on a single-ended, narrow bus? ...
      (comp.periphs.scsi)
    • Re: Partition size for cloned drive
      ... On top of that, it gives you compression ability, to ... make what you save smaller that what it actually occupies. ... >I am trying to set up a partition on a second physical drive that will ... > waste too much space on both drives? ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support)