Re: [RFC] must fix lists
From: Alan Cox (alan_at_lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: 10/25/03
- Previous message: Andi Kleen: "Re: [AMD64 1/3] fix C99-style declarations"
- In reply to: Chris Wright: "Re: [RFC] must fix lists"
- Next in thread: Nick Piggin: "[RFC][PATCH] must fix lists"
- Reply: Nick Piggin: "[RFC][PATCH] must fix lists"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org> Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2003 21:18:08 +0100
On Gwe, 2003-10-24 at 01:23, Chris Wright wrote:
> > Someone also needs to go fix all the 2.4 security holes still in 2.6
> > last time I checked - things like the execve holes and execve versus
> > proc races.
>
> I thought these had been fixed, but I'd be happy to take a look.
I got mail from a guy at intel implying the unshare_files stuff wasnt in
2.6 yet
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Andi Kleen: "Re: [AMD64 1/3] fix C99-style declarations"
- In reply to: Chris Wright: "Re: [RFC] must fix lists"
- Next in thread: Nick Piggin: "[RFC][PATCH] must fix lists"
- Reply: Nick Piggin: "[RFC][PATCH] must fix lists"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
