Re: READAHEAD
From: Andrew Morton (akpm_at_osdl.org)
Date: 10/31/03
- Previous message: Benjamin Herrenschmidt: "Re: RadeonFB [Re: 2.4.23pre8 - ACPI Kernel Panic on boot]"
- In reply to: Nuno Silva: "Re: READAHEAD"
- Next in thread: age: "Re: READAHEAD"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 00:03:08 -0800 To: Nuno Silva <nuno.silva@vgertech.com>
Nuno Silva <nuno.silva@vgertech.com> wrote:
>
> >> Before, i never had to set readahead so high
> >> Please could you tell me, what is going on here ?
> >
> >
> > Lots of people have been reporting this. It's rather weird.
> >
>
> I know nothing about this but, FWIW, I think that what changed where the
> units. With 2.4 you specify sectors, with 2.6 you specify bytes.
>
> So, having -a8, in 2.4, is the same as having -a$((8*512)) [it's 4096
> :)], in 2.6.
>
No, everything seems OK. Both `hdparm -a' and `blockdev --setra' are
operating in units of 512 bytes.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Benjamin Herrenschmidt: "Re: RadeonFB [Re: 2.4.23pre8 - ACPI Kernel Panic on boot]"
- In reply to: Nuno Silva: "Re: READAHEAD"
- Next in thread: age: "Re: READAHEAD"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|