Re: Nick's scheduler v17a
From: Rhino (rhino9_at_terra.com.br)
Date: 10/31/03
- Previous message: Hans Reiser: "Re: Things that Longhorn seems to be doing right"
- In reply to: Nick Piggin: "Nick's scheduler v17a"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 18:57:40 -0400 To: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 14:41:07 +1100
Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au> wrote:
> http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/v17a/
>
> More balancing fixes. I also incorporated some of Andrew Theurer's
> ideas. I'm generally getting good numbers now, but using fairly
> synthetic benchmarks.
>
> Now would be a good time to test if anyone is interested. Thanks.
well i didn't have the time to make extensive tests yet, but the behaviour improved a lot since v16,
and *looks* quite better compared to test9 on a 2 way xeon p4 with hyperthreading enabled,
seeing 4 cpu's.
when i get back home, I'll try to make a few benchmarks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Hans Reiser: "Re: Things that Longhorn seems to be doing right"
- In reply to: Nick Piggin: "Nick's scheduler v17a"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
