Re: 2.6-test6: nanosleep+SIGCONT weirdness
From: Linus Torvalds (torvalds_at_osdl.org)
Date: 11/08/03
- Previous message: Anton Blanchard: "Re: 2.6-test6: nanosleep+SIGCONT weirdness"
- In reply to: Anton Blanchard: "Re: 2.6-test6: nanosleep+SIGCONT weirdness"
- Next in thread: Ulrich Drepper: "Re: 2.6-test6: nanosleep+SIGCONT weirdness"
- Reply: Ulrich Drepper: "Re: 2.6-test6: nanosleep+SIGCONT weirdness"
- Reply: Anton Blanchard: "Re: 2.6-test6: nanosleep+SIGCONT weirdness"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 10:56:11 -0800 (PST) To: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003, Anton Blanchard wrote:
>
> > I observe some strange behaviour in 2.6-test6 with this small program:
>
> Something looks wrong with the syscall restart stuff in 2.6, I noticed it
> when doing:
No, the restart code is fine. But the posix timer code looks fundamentally
broken. Try the patch I just sent, I bet it fixes it.
I can try to fix the posix-timer.c code too, but it looks like even modern
glibc doesn't even export the clock_nanosleep() function. So it might not
be worth fixing at this point..
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Anton Blanchard: "Re: 2.6-test6: nanosleep+SIGCONT weirdness"
- In reply to: Anton Blanchard: "Re: 2.6-test6: nanosleep+SIGCONT weirdness"
- Next in thread: Ulrich Drepper: "Re: 2.6-test6: nanosleep+SIGCONT weirdness"
- Reply: Ulrich Drepper: "Re: 2.6-test6: nanosleep+SIGCONT weirdness"
- Reply: Anton Blanchard: "Re: 2.6-test6: nanosleep+SIGCONT weirdness"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|