syscall numbers larger than 255?
From: Chris Friesen (cfriesen_at_nortelnetworks.com)
Date: 11/10/03
- Previous message: Paulo Marques: "Re: compressed tmpfs"
- Next in thread: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: syscall numbers larger than 255?"
- Reply: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: syscall numbers larger than 255?"
- Reply: Davide Libenzi: "Re: syscall numbers larger than 255?"
- Maybe reply: Andi Kleen: "Re: syscall numbers larger than 255?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 10:36:33 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Just a quick and simple question for someone that knows the answer.
Stock 2.4.20 for i386 uses syscalls up to 252. I want to add about a
half-dozen new syscalls (forward porting stuff that we've got on 2.4.18).
Does x86 support syscall numbers > 255? If yes, do I have to do
anything special to use them? If not, what are my options?
Thanks,
Chris
-- Chris Friesen | MailStop: 043/33/F10 Nortel Networks | work: (613) 765-0557 3500 Carling Avenue | fax: (613) 765-2986 Nepean, ON K2H 8E9 Canada | email: cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Paulo Marques: "Re: compressed tmpfs"
- Next in thread: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: syscall numbers larger than 255?"
- Reply: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: syscall numbers larger than 255?"
- Reply: Davide Libenzi: "Re: syscall numbers larger than 255?"
- Maybe reply: Andi Kleen: "Re: syscall numbers larger than 255?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|